Skip to main content
Fixed grammar
Source Link

I have a question that I have not found any related source, and my question is mostly focused on these group of people: "People of origin from Ibero-American countries, Andorra, the Philippines, Equatorial Guinea or Portugal or Sephardic, who are pursuing a PhD in Spain** Ph."D.* in Spain."*

In many European countries, such as Poland (where I reside) or the Czech Republic (where a person I know resides) your studies as a master or doctoral student (not undergraduate) count as half of the residence time in these countries and in countries like The Netherlands, if you pursue a PhDPh.D. (strictly a PhDPh.D.), your years of residence are counted as full-time residing in that place.

Based on the previous examples, if you pursue a PhDPh.D. in Poland or Czechia for 4 years, it means: "You have lived 2 years and if you learned Polish (B1+) and worked for 3 years more, then you are eligible for the permanent residence card."

And in The Netherlands, if you pursued a 4 years PhDPh.D. (considered as regular work by their law), passed the integration test, worked 1 year more, and learned Dutch (B1+), you are eligible to apply for the permanent residence card.

What is the situation in Spain? Does the doctoral student's time count towards to your citizenship?

The time as a "doctoral student" is not something clear in most of cases and less their legal status (in The Netherlands you get a researcher's visa, not a student's one, for instance). I only found that in Spain if you're a regular student (not a PhDPh.D. one) your time is not counted.

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt offrom paying taxes and you get some benefits and as a PhDPh.D. researcher, you often pay taxes as a regular worker. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a PhDPh.D. researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Also, as a PhDPh.D. researcher, you might need to teach a certain amount of hours per semester, work on your research full-time, write and present scientific papers, support other professors, and rarely, you will receive some classes since you're becoming an expert in one specific arearea of the science.

Most of the time, a PhDPh.D. researcher could be seen as a regular workerwork because you have certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly you're creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning in Python."

For all previous reasons, in most of European countries, a "doctoral student" is considered as a researcher inside the universities and the concept of scholarships tend to be uncommon (Canada, the US, Australia, etc. Cannot be taken as the general rule) because even in Marie Curie, which provides many of the EU "PhD"Ph.D. scholarships", for instance, they are considered as jobs, not scholarships as you can see in the image below.

I have a question that I have not found any related source, and my question is mostly focused on these group of people: "People of origin from Ibero-American countries, Andorra, the Philippines, Equatorial Guinea or Portugal or Sephardic, who are pursuing a PhD in Spain."

In many European countries, such as Poland (where I reside) or the Czech Republic (where a person I know resides) your studies as a master or doctoral student (not undergraduate) count as half of residence time in these countries and in countries like The Netherlands, if you pursue a PhD (strictly a PhD), your years of residence are counted as full-time residing in that place.

Based on the previous examples, if you pursue a PhD in Poland or Czechia for 4 years, it means: "You have lived 2 years and if you learned Polish (B1+) and worked for 3 years more, then you are eligible for the permanent residence card."

And in The Netherlands, if you pursued a 4 years PhD (considered as regular work by their law), passed the integration test, worked 1 year more and learned Dutch (B1+), you are eligible apply for the permanent residence card.

What is the situation in Spain? Does the doctoral student's time count towards to your citizenship?

The time as a "doctoral student" is not something clear in most of cases and less their legal status (in The Netherlands you get researcher's visa, not a student's one, for instance). I only found that in Spain if you're a regular student (not a PhD one) your time is not counted.

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and you get some benefits and as a PhD researcher, you often pay taxes as a regular worker. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a PhD researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Also, as a PhD researcher, you might need to teach certain amount of hours per semester, work on your research full-time, write and present scientific papers, support other professors and rarely, you will receive some classes since you're becoming an expert in one specific are of the science.

Most of time, a PhD researcher could be seen as regular worker because you have certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly you're creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning in Python."

For all previous reasons, in most of European countries, a "doctoral student" is considered as a researcher inside the universities and the concept of scholarships tend to be uncommon (Canada, the US, Australia, etc. Cannot be taken as the general rule) because even in Marie Curie, which provides many of the EU "PhD scholarships", for instance, they are considered as jobs not scholarships as you can see in the image below.

I have a question that I have not found any related source, and my question is mostly focused on these group of people: "People of origin from Ibero-American countries, Andorra, the Philippines, Equatorial Guinea or Portugal or Sephardic, who are pursuing a ** Ph.D.* in Spain."*

In many European countries, such as Poland (where I reside) or the Czech Republic (where a person I know resides) your studies as a master or doctoral student (not undergraduate) count as half of the residence time in these countries and in countries like The Netherlands, if you pursue a Ph.D. (strictly a Ph.D.), your years of residence are counted as full-time residing in that place.

Based on the previous examples, if you pursue a Ph.D. in Poland or Czechia for 4 years, it means: "You have lived 2 years and if you learned Polish (B1+) and worked for 3 years more, then you are eligible for the permanent residence card."

And in The Netherlands, if you pursued a 4 years Ph.D. (considered as regular work by their law), passed the integration test, worked 1 year more, and learned Dutch (B1+), you are eligible to apply for the permanent residence card.

What is the situation in Spain? Does the doctoral student's time count towards your citizenship?

The time as a "doctoral student" is not something clear in most cases and less their legal status (in The Netherlands you get a researcher's visa, not a student's one, for instance). I only found that in Spain if you're a regular student (not a Ph.D. one) your time is not counted.

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt from paying taxes and you get some benefits and as a Ph.D. researcher, you often pay taxes as a regular worker. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a Ph.D. researcher since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Also, as a Ph.D. researcher, you might need to teach a certain amount of hours per semester, work on your research full-time, write and present scientific papers, support other professors, and rarely, you will receive some classes since you're becoming an expert in one specific area of the science.

Most of the time, a Ph.D. researcher could be seen as a regular work because you have certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly you're creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning in Python."

For all previous reasons, in most European countries, a "doctoral student" is considered as a researcher inside the universities and the concept of scholarships tend to be uncommon (Canada, the US, Australia, etc. Cannot be taken as the general rule) because even in Marie Curie, which provides many of the EU "Ph.D. scholarships", for instance, they are considered as jobs, not scholarships as you can see in the image below.

added 13 characters in body
Source Link

Because I read that in certain articles the following (translated):

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and you get some benefits and as a PhD researcher, you often pay taxes as a regular worker. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a PhD researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Most of time, a PhD researcher could be seen as regular worker because it hasyou have certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly isyou're creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning in Python."

Because I read that in certain articles the following:

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and you get some benefits. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a PhD researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Most of time, a PhD researcher could be seen as regular worker because it has certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly is creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning."

Because I read that in certain articles the following (translated):

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and you get some benefits and as a PhD researcher, you often pay taxes as a regular worker. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a PhD researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Most of time, a PhD researcher could be seen as regular worker because you have certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly you're creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning in Python."

added 48 characters in body
Source Link

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and you get some benefits. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes tointo play between a regular student and a PhD researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Also, as a PhD researcher, you might need to teach certain amount of hours per semester, work on your research full-time, write and present scientific papers, support other professors and rarely, you will receive some classes since you're becoming an expert in one specific are of the science. 

Most of time, you're solving a particularPhD researcher could be seen as regular worker because it has certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly is creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning."

InFor all previous reasons, in most of European countries, a "doctoral student" is considered as a researcher inside the universities. A kind of worker and the concept of scholarships tend to be uncommon (Canada, the US, Australia, etc. Cannot be taken as the general rule) because even in Marie Curie, which provides many of the EU "PhD scholarships", for instance, they are considered as jobs not scholarships as you can see in the image below.

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and get some benefits. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes to play between a regular student and a PhD researcher since taxes are used for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Also, as a PhD researcher, you might need to teach certain amount of hours per semester, work on your research full-time, write and present scientific papers, support other professors and rarely, you will receive some classes since you're becoming an expert in one specific are of the science. Most of time, you're solving a particular problem for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning."

In most of European countries, a "doctoral student" is considered as a researcher inside the universities. A kind of worker and the concept of scholarships tend to be uncommon (Canada, the US, Australia, etc. Cannot be taken as the general rule) because even in Marie Curie, which provides many of the EU "PhD scholarships", for instance, they are considered as jobs not scholarships as you can see in the image below.

And it's perfectly reasonable, since generally, when you're a regular student either you have a scholarship or you're paying your studies; technically, you tend to be exempt of paying taxes and you get some benefits. And this point of paying taxes is where a key difference comes into play between a regular student and a PhD researcher, since taxes are used, for retirement or social benefits like health or social care.

Also, as a PhD researcher, you might need to teach certain amount of hours per semester, work on your research full-time, write and present scientific papers, support other professors and rarely, you will receive some classes since you're becoming an expert in one specific are of the science. 

Most of time, a PhD researcher could be seen as regular worker because it has certain responsibilities, pay taxes, get a salary, and most importantly is creating a unique solution to a problem with more or less clear goals and expected outcomes in a defined period of time (in the corporate world, a project) for a company, government, the university or an organization. An example could be the following one: "To design an algorithm for the detection of breast cancer with Machine Learning."

For all previous reasons, in most of European countries, a "doctoral student" is considered as a researcher inside the universities and the concept of scholarships tend to be uncommon (Canada, the US, Australia, etc. Cannot be taken as the general rule) because even in Marie Curie, which provides many of the EU "PhD scholarships", for instance, they are considered as jobs not scholarships as you can see in the image below.

added 48 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 82 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Loading
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Corrected tags
Link
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading