Timeline for 90/180 Schengen rule for people with two justifications
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2021 at 1:28 | vote | accept | sequence | ||
| Nov 21, 2021 at 20:21 | comment | added | phoog | @Relaxed the question seems to assume that the passport and the residence permit separately entitle the bearer to 90 days of presence in a 180-day period in countries other than the one issuing the residence permit. In fact, the Schengen codes contemplate that a third-country national requires a passport whether in possession of a residence permit or not, so the residence permit does not in fact by itself entitle the (Annex II) bearer to anything outside of the issuing country. | |
| Nov 21, 2021 at 18:14 | comment | added | Mark Johnson | @Relaxed Since residence (migration and home affairs) is within the shared competence category, the primary decision is up to a member state which (and under which conditions) a 3rd country nationals may reside within their territory. The issued residence permit is only valid within that territory. It does permit short-term visits (Article 6(1): 'of a duration of no more than 90 days in any 180-day period') to other member states. | |
| Nov 21, 2021 at 16:08 | comment | added | Relaxed | What's your basis for that answer? What 90/180 rule are you referring to? This interpretation is not at all obvious and that's exactly what the question is about. | |
| Nov 21, 2021 at 8:18 | history | answered | Mark Johnson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |