Timeline for In the Netherlands, am I obligated to refund a previous employer for missing deductions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2022 at 21:09 | comment | added | Rick | @Gala Thanks for getting back to me so soon :) It looks like to OP over at LawSE has managed to follow your link. Thanks again | |
| Aug 30, 2022 at 19:04 | comment | added | Gala | @Rick I changed nicknames when SE made it more difficult to maintain several accounts on different sites and stopped using this one to avoid any confusion. I am still active on this site but I am afraid I don't recall any of it. | |
| Aug 30, 2022 at 17:43 | comment | added | Rick | @Gala I see from your profile that you haven't been active for a while, but in the hope you come back - your link for "past examples" is broken. Are you able to offer a replacement, by any chance please? There's a related question on LawSE that could do with some supporting caselaw. Many thanks. | |
| Aug 19, 2016 at 21:13 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: -2 | |
| Aug 19, 2016 at 6:01 | vote | accept | Eugen Martynov | ||
| Aug 18, 2016 at 9:08 | comment | added | Gala | @EugenMartynov Yes but the question is whether you should/could, as an employee, know there was a mistake. That's the standard applied by the courts AFAIK. But looking at past examples, it seems that courts mostly find against employee, I would not be very optimistic. | |
| Aug 18, 2016 at 9:06 | comment | added | Eugen Martynov | There was definitely a mistake from their side. Thank you! | |
| Aug 18, 2016 at 9:05 | comment | added | Gala | From a web search in Dutch and without any guarantees, it seems to depend on whether you (the employee) could reasonably know there was a mistake or not. I obviously don't know whether your situation qualifies but it seems somewhat difficult to argue. | |
| S Aug 17, 2016 at 6:22 | history | edited | ouflak♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
phrasing, title to better fit body, tags
|
| S Aug 17, 2016 at 6:22 | history | suggested | einpoklum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
phrasing, title to better fit body, tags
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 20:52 | answer | added | einpoklum | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 20:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 17, 2016 at 6:22 | |||||
| Aug 16, 2016 at 17:29 | comment | added | deviantfan | Ah, it was 8 times ... (still 200 too much,but that's probably the lawyer) | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 17:00 | comment | added | Eugen Martynov | Yes, they know that this is because their mistake and 5000 is because 300*2*8 months | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 16:54 | comment | added | deviantfan |
So they gave you 300 too much, and now they want 5000? Did they give any reason for such a difference? several times contacted HR that I don't see a deduction. Did you tell them that?
|
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 12:15 | history | asked | Eugen Martynov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |